From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Nichols M. N. P.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 5, 2017
225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter in a civil proceeding, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal

Summary of this case from Stephens v. Godwin
See 12 Summaries

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D17-1682.

09-05-2017

Roderick CLARK, Petitioner, v. NICHOLS M. N. P., Respondent.

Roderick Clark, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Roderick Clark, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has not demonstrated that the trial court has failed to timely consider and rule upon any motion after having that matter called up for hearing and disposition. Petitioner has therefore failed to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. See Moore v. Corr. Med. Servs., 817 So.2d 963, 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) ("Absent a showing that the trial court has failed to take action on some pending matter he has noticed for hearing, [the petitioner] has failed to establish an entitlement to mandamus relief."); Smartt v. First Union Nat'l Bank, 771 So.2d 1232 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). We DENY the petition accordingly.

LEWIS, RAY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Summaries of

Clark v. Nichols M. N. P.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 5, 2017
225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter in a civil proceeding, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal

Summary of this case from Stephens v. Godwin

holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter in a civil proceeding, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal

Summary of this case from Brewer v. Dep't of Corr.

holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal

Summary of this case from Torrey v. Pensacola Police Dep't

holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal

Summary of this case from Mathews v. City of Jacksonville

holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending civil matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal

Summary of this case from Kline v. Pub. Def. for Fourth Judicial Circuit

holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending civil matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal

Summary of this case from Norman v. Eberlien

holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending civil matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal

Summary of this case from Norman v. Fla. Dept. of Corr.

holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending civil matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal

Summary of this case from Casen v. Fla. Dep't of Children & Families

holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal

Summary of this case from Edwards v. Inch

holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal

Summary of this case from Hicks v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.

holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal

Summary of this case from Brooks v. Willis

holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal

Summary of this case from C. C. v. Dep't of Children & Families
Case details for

Clark v. Nichols M. N. P.

Case Details

Full title:Roderick CLARK, Petitioner, v. NICHOLS M. N. P., Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Sep 5, 2017

Citations

225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

Torrey v. Pensacola Police Dep't

The Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus on the merits. SeeClark v. Nichols M. N. P. , 225 So. 3d…

Torrey v. Pensacola Police Dep't

The Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus on the merits. See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P., 225 So.3d…

18 Citing Cases