From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norman v. Eberlien

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Dec 18, 2020
310 So. 3d 1083 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D20-2336

12-18-2020

John L. NORMAN, Petitioner, v. Sgt. EBERLIEN, Respondent.

John L. Norman, pro se, Petitioner. Maria A. Santoro of Dennis, Jackson, Martin & Fontela, P.A., Tallahassee, for Respondent.


John L. Norman, pro se, Petitioner.

Maria A. Santoro of Dennis, Jackson, Martin & Fontela, P.A., Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P. , 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending civil matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal).

Lewis, Rowe, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Norman v. Eberlien

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Dec 18, 2020
310 So. 3d 1083 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Norman v. Eberlien

Case Details

Full title:JOHN L. NORMAN, Petitioner, v. SGT. EBERLIEN, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Dec 18, 2020

Citations

310 So. 3d 1083 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)