From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. Inch

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jul 23, 2019
No. 1D19-0851 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jul. 23, 2019)

Opinion

No. 1D19-0851

07-23-2019

DOUGLAS TARON EDWARDS, Petitioner, v. MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al., Respondent.

Douglas Taron Edwards, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristen J. Lonergan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P., 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal). ROBERTS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla . R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. Douglas Taron Edwards, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristen J. Lonergan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Summaries of

Edwards v. Inch

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jul 23, 2019
No. 1D19-0851 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jul. 23, 2019)
Case details for

Edwards v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS TARON EDWARDS, Petitioner, v. MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida…

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jul 23, 2019

Citations

No. 1D19-0851 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jul. 23, 2019)