From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Willis

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
May 13, 2019
270 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 1D19-1053

05-13-2019

Alexander C. BROOKS, Petitioner, v. Kristine N. WILLIS, Respondent.

Alexander C. Brooks, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Alexander C. Brooks, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Clark v. Nichols M.N.P. , 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal).

Makar, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Brooks v. Willis

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
May 13, 2019
270 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Brooks v. Willis

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER C. BROOKS, Petitioner, v. KRISTINE N. WILLIS, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: May 13, 2019

Citations

270 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)