Section 1730-05-.12 - DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS, CIVIL PENALTIES, ASSESSMENT OF COSTS, AND SCREENING PANELS(1) Upon a finding by the Board that C.A.E.T. has violated any provision of the Tennessee Veterinary Medical Practice Act (T.C.A. §§ 63-12-101, et seq.) or the rules promulgated thereto, the Board may impose any of the following actions separately or in any combination deemed appropriate to the offense: (a) Advisory Censure - This is a written action issued to the C.A.E.T. for minor or near infractions. It is informal and advisory in nature and does not constitute a formal disciplinary action.(b) Formal Censure or Reprimand - This is a written action issued to a C.A.E.T. for one time and less severe violations. It is a formal disciplinary action.(c) Probation - This is a formal disciplinary action which places C.A.E.T. on close scrutiny for a fixed period of time. This action may be combined with conditions which must be met before probation will be lifted and/or which restrict the individual's activities during the probationary period.(d) Certificate Suspension - This is a formal disciplinary action which suspends an individual's right to practice for a fixed period of time. It contemplates the reinstatement of the individual's certificate. When the Board suspends a certificate, the person may not practice as a C.A.E.T. during the period of suspension and is also prohibited from providing direct assistance to another C.A.E.T. in the euthanasia of any animal.(e) Conditions - Any action deemed appropriate by the Board to be required of a disciplined certificate holder in any of the following circumstances:1. During any period of probation, suspension; or2. During any period of revocation after which the certificate holder may petition for an order of compliance to reinstate the revoked certificate; or3. As a prerequisite to the lifting of probation or suspension or as a prerequisite to the reinstatement of a revoked certificate; or4. As a stand-alone requirement(s) in any disciplinary order.(f) Civil penalty - A monetary disciplinary action assessed by the Board pursuant to paragraph (5) of this rule.(g) Revocation for Cause. This the most severe form of disciplinary action which removes an individual from the practice of the profession and terminates the certification previously issued. The Board, in its discretion, may allow reinstatement of a revoked certificate upon conditions and after a period a time it deems appropriate. No petition for reinstatement and no new application for certification from a person whose certificate was revoked shall be considered prior to the expiration of at least one (1) year unless otherwise stated in the Board's revocation order.(2) Once ordered, probation, suspension, revocation, assessment of a civil penalty, or any other condition of any type of disciplinary action may not be lifted unless and until the certificate holder petitions, pursuant to paragraph (3) of this rule, and appears before the Board after the period of initial probation, suspension, revocation, or other conditioning has run and all conditions placed on the probation, suspension, revocation, have been met, and after any civil penalties assessed have been paid.(3) Order of Compliance - This procedure is a necessary adjunct to previously issued disciplinary orders and is available only when a petitioner has completely complied with the provisions of a previously issued disciplinary order, including an uncertified practice civil penalty order, and wishes or is required to obtain an order reflecting that compliance. (a) The Board will entertain petitions for an Order of Compliance as a supplement to a previously issued order upon strict compliance with the procedures set forth in subparagraph (b) in only the following three (3) circumstances:1. When the petitioner can prove compliance with all the terms of the previously issued order and is seeking to have an order issued reflecting that compliance; or2. When the petitioner can prove compliance with all the terms of the previously issued order and is seeking to have an order issued lifting a previously ordered suspension or probation; or3. When the petitioner can prove compliance with all the terms of the previously issued order and is seeking to have an order issued reinstating a certificate previously revoked.(b) Procedures 1. The petitioner shall submit a Petition for Order of Compliance, as contained in subparagraph (c), to the Board's Administrative Office that shall contain all of the following: (i) A copy of the previously issued order; and(ii) A statement of which provision of subparagraph (a) the petitioner is relying upon as a basis for the requested order; and(iii) A copy of all documents that prove compliance with all the terms or conditions of the previously issued order. If proof of compliance requires testimony of an individual(s), including that of the petitioner, the petitioner must submit signed statements from every individual the petitioner intends to rely upon attesting, under oath, to the compliance. The Board's consultant and administrative staff, in their discretion, may require such signed statements to be notarized. No documentation or testimony other than that submitted will be considered in making an initial determination on, or a final order in response to, the petition.2. The Board authorizes its consultant and administrative staff to make an initial determination on the petition and take one of the following actions:(i) Certify compliance and have the matter scheduled for presentation to the Board as an uncontested matter; or(ii) Deny the petition, after consultation with legal staff, if compliance with all of the provisions of the previous order is not proven and notify the petitioner of what provisions remain to be fulfilled and/or what proof of compliance was either not sufficient or not submitted.3. If the petition is presented to the Board the petitioner may not submit any additional documentation or testimony other than that contained in the petition as originally submitted.4. If the Board finds that the petitioner has complied with all the terms of the previous order an Order of Compliance shall be issued.5. If the petition is denied either initially by staff or after presentation to the Board and the petitioner believes compliance with the order has been sufficiently proven the petitioner may, as authorized by law, file a petition for a declaratory order pursuant to the provisions of T.C.A. § 4-5-223 and rule 1200-10-01-.11.(4) Order Modifications - This procedure is not intended to allow anyone under a previously issued disciplinary order, including an uncertified practice civil penalty order, to modify any findings of fact, conclusions of law, or the reasons for the decision contained in the order. It is also not intended to allow a petition for a lesser disciplinary action, or civil penalty other than the one(s) previously ordered. All such provisions of Board orders were subject to reconsideration and appeal under the provisions of the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act (T.C.A. §§ 4-5-301, et seq.). This procedure is not available as a substitute for reconsideration and/or appeal and is only available after all reconsideration and appeal rights have been either exhausted or not timely pursued. It is also not available for those who have accepted and been issued a reprimand.(a) The Board will entertain petitions for modification of the disciplinary portion of previously issued orders upon strict compliance with the procedures set forth in subparagraph (b) only when the petitioner can prove that compliance with any one or more of the conditions or terms of the discipline previously ordered is impossible. For purposes of this rule the term "impossible" does not mean that compliance is inconvenient or impractical for personal, financial, scheduling or other reasons.(b) Procedures 1. The petitioner shall submit a written and signed Petition for Order Modification on the form contained in subparagraph (c) to the Board's Administrative Office that shall contain all of the following:(i) A copy of the previously issued order; and(ii) A statement of why the petitioner believes it is impossible to comply with the order as issued; and(iii) A copy of all documents that proves that compliance is impossible. If proof of impossibility of compliance requires testimony of an individual(s), including that of the petitioner, the petitioner must submit signed and notarized statements from every individual the petitioner intends to rely upon attesting, under oath, to the reasons why compliance is impossible. No documentation or testimony other than that submitted will be considered in making an initial determination on, or a final order in response to, the petition.2. The Board authorizes its consultant and administrative staff to make an initial determination on the petition and take one of the following actions:(i) Certify impossibility of compliance and forward the petition to the Office of General Counsel for presentation to the Board as an uncontested matter; or(ii) Deny the petition, after consultation with legal staff, if impossibility of compliance with the provisions of the previous order is not proven and notify the petitioner of what proof of impossibility of compliance was either not sufficient or not submitted.3. If the petition is presented to the Board the petitioner may not submit any additional documentation or testimony other than that contained in the petition as originally submitted.4. If the petition is granted a new order shall be issued reflecting the modifications authorized by the Board that it deemed appropriate and necessary in relation to the violations found in the previous order.5. If the petition is denied either initially by staff or after presentation to the Board and the petitioner believes impossibility of compliance with the order has been sufficiently proven the petitioner may, as authorized by law, file a petition for a declaratory order pursuant to the provisions of T.C.A. § 4-5-223 and rule 1200-10-01-.11.(5) Civil Penalties (a) Purpose - The purpose of this rule is to set out a schedule designating the minimum and maximum civil penalties which may be assessed pursuant to T.C.A. § 63-1-134.(b) Schedule of Civil Penalties 1. A Type A civil penalty may be imposed whenever the Board finds the person who is required to be certified by the Board is guilty of a willful and knowing violation of the Veterinary Practice Act, or regulations pursuant thereto, to such an extent that there is, or likely to be an imminent substantial threat to the health, safety, and welfare of an individual client or the public. For purposes of this section, a type A penalty shall include, but not be limited to, a person who willfully and knowingly is or was practicing as a C.A.E.T. without a certificate from the Board.2. A Type B civil penalty may be imposed whenever the Board finds the person required to be certified by the Board is guilty of a violation of the Veterinary Practice Act or regulations pursuant thereto in such manner as to impact directly on the care of clients or the public.3. A Type C civil penalty may be imposed whenever the Board finds the person required to be certified by the Board is guilty of a violation of the Veterinary Practice Act or regulations promulgated thereto, which are neither directly detrimental to clients or the public, nor directly impact their care, but have only an indirect relationship to client care or the public.(c) Amount of Civil Penalties 1. Type A civil penalties shall be assessed in the amount of not less than $500 nor more than $1,000.2. Type B civil penalties may be assessed in the amount of not less than $100 and not more than $500.3. Type C civil penalties may be assessed in the amount of not less than $50 and not more than $100.(d) Procedures for Assessing Civil Penalties 1. The Division of Health Related Boards may initiate a civil penalty assessment by filing a Memorandum of Assessment of Civil Penalty. The Division shall state in the memorandum the facts and law upon which it relies in alleging a violation, the proposed amount of the civil penalty and the basis for such penalty. The Division may incorporate the Memorandum of Assessment of Civil Penalty with a Notice of Charges which may be issued attendant thereto.2. Civil Penalties may also be initiated and assessed by the Board during consideration of any Notice of Charges. In addition, the Board may, upon good cause shown, assess type and amount of civil penalty which was not recommended by the Division.3. In assessing the civil penalties pursuant to these rules the Board may consider the following factors: (i) Whether the amount imposed will be a substantial economic deterrent to the violator;(ii) The circumstances leading to the violation;(iii) The severity of the violation and the risk of harm to the public;(iv) The economic benefits gained by the violator as a result of non-compliance; and,(v) The interest of the public.4. All proceedings for the assessment of civil penalties shall be governed by the contested case provisions of T.C.A. Title 4, Chapter 5.(6) Informal Settlements - The Board consultant is authorized to enter into informal settlement agreements under which a complaint against an individual may be closed without any disciplinary action. Any matter proposed for informal settlement must be subsequently ratified by the full board before it will become effective. Such agreement may include any terms deemed appropriate by the Board consultant including, but not limited to:(a) Mandatory education program or course attendance;(b) Submission of reports, records or other appropriate documentation;(c) Conditioning of the individual's activities in any manner which affects his practice in Tennessee.(7) Assessment of costs in disciplinary proceedings shall be as set forth in T.C.A. §§ 63-1-144 and 63-12-143.(8) Screening Panels - Any screening panel(s) established pursuant to T.C.A. § 63-1-138: (a) Shall have concurrent authority with the Board and any individual appointed by the Board pursuant to Rule 1730-05-.09, to do the acts enumerated in Rule 1730-05-.09(1) (b) 1. and 2. subject to the conditions contained therein.1. A Screening panel(s) comprised of two (2) or more persons shall elect a chairperson prior to convening to conduct business.2. A screening panel(s) comprised of two (2) or more persons is required to conduct the informal hearings authorized in subparagraph (b) immediately below.(b) After completion of an investigation by the Division, may upon request of either the state, or the C.A.E.T. who is the subject of an investigation with the agreement of the state, or upon request of both the C.A.E.T. and the state, conduct a non- binding informal hearing and make recommendations as a result thereof as to what, if any, terms of settlement of any potential disciplinary action are appropriate. 1. Neither the Rules of Civil Procedure, the Rules of Mediation and Arbitration, the Rules of Evidence, or Contested Case Procedural Rules under the Administrative Procedures Act shall apply in informal hearings before the screening panel(s). However, Rule 31 of the Rules of the Tennessee Supreme Court may serve as general guidance as to the principles of mediation and alternative dispute resolution. (i) Evidence may be presented or received in any manner and in whatever order agreed upon by the parties.(ii) Prior to convening the panel and in the absence of an agreement of the parties, the screening panel chairperson shall determine the manner and order of presentation of evidence.2. Neither the state nor a C.A.E.T. who is the subject of an investigation being considered by a screening panel can be compelled to participate in any informal hearing.3. Proposed settlements reached as a result of any informal hearing will not become binding and final unless they are: (i) Approved by a majority of the members of the screening panel which issued them; and(ii) Agreed to by both the Department of Health, by and through its attorney(s), and the C.A.E.T.; and(iii) Subsequently presented to and ratified by the Board.(9) Reconsiderations and Stays. The Board authorizes the member who chaired the Board for a contested case to be the agency member to make the decisions authorized pursuant to rule 1360-04-01-.18 regarding petitions for reconsiderations and stays in that case.Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 1730-05-.12
Original rule filed December 21, 1999; effective March 5, 2000. Amendment filed August 24, 2000; effective November 7, 2000. Amendment filed June 25, 2003; effective September 8, 2003. Amendment filed September 23, 2004; effective December 7, 2004. Amendment filed July 18, 2007; effective October 1, 2007. Amendment filed September 10, 2009; effective December 9, 2009.Authority: T.C.A. §§ 4-5-202, 4-5-204, 63-12-105, 63-12-106, 63-12-124, 63-12-128, and 63-12-141.