From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warenback v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 23, 2017
No. 71056 (Nev. App. Mar. 23, 2017)

Opinion

No. 71056

03-23-2017

DOUGLAS HARRY WARENBACK, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Appellant Douglas Harry Warenback appeals from a district court order denying the "motion to withdraw plea pursuant to NRS 176.165" he filed on May 24, 2016. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; William D. Kephart, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument. NRAP 34(f)(3).

Warenback claims the district court erred in construing his motion as a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus and by concluding his structural-error claim was barred by the doctrine of the law of the case.

We conclude the district court properly construed Warenback's motion as a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus and its decision to deny the petition produced the correct result albeit for the wrong reason. See Harris v. State, 130 Nev. ___, ___, 329 P.3d 619, 628 (2014); Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298, 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970).

Warenback's petition was untimely because it was filed more than two years after entry of the judgment of conviction on December 17, 2013, see NRS 34.726(1), it was successive because he had previously filed two postconviction petitions for writs of habeas corpus, see NRS 34.810(2), and the procedural bars were unexcused because he made no attempt to show good cause for filing a late and successive petition, see NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(3). Therefore, the petition should have been denied as procedurally barred. See State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court (Riker), 121 Nev. 225, 231, 112 P.3d 1070, 1074 (2005).

No direct appeal was taken.

Warenback v. State, Docket No. 69536 (Order of Affirmance, May 18, 2016); Warenback v. State, Docket No. 66294 (Order of Affirmance, April 14, 2015). --------

Having concluded the district court reached the correct result by denying Warenback's petition, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge

Douglas Harry Warenback

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Warenback v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 23, 2017
No. 71056 (Nev. App. Mar. 23, 2017)
Case details for

Warenback v. State

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS HARRY WARENBACK, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 23, 2017

Citations

No. 71056 (Nev. App. Mar. 23, 2017)

Citing Cases

Warenback v. State

See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(3). Warenback v. State, Docket No. 72280 (Order of Affirmance, July 12, 2017);…

Warenback v. State

Warenback did not pursue a direct appeal. Warenback v. State, Docket No. 71056 (Order of Affirmance, March…