In State v. Conger, No. 92,381, 2005 WL 1561369, at *3 (Kan. App. 2005) (unpublished opinion), a panel of this court found it significant the defendant had been arrested and taken to jail involuntarily rather than to visit an inmate on her own terms.
Summary of this case from State v. HinostrozaNo. 92,381.
July 1, 2005.
Appeal from the Labette.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
In State v. Conger, No. 92,381, 2005 WL 1561369, at *3 (Kan. App. 2005) (unpublished opinion), a panel of this court found it significant the defendant had been arrested and taken to jail involuntarily rather than to visit an inmate on her own terms.
Summary of this case from State v. HinostrozaFull title:STATE v. CONGER
Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas
Date published: Jul 1, 2005
The State further contends that because Thompson's possession of contraband was not discovered until she was…
State v. HinostrozaWhile the panel’s discussion did not refer to K.S.A. 21-5201(b), it did illustrate how disclosure can avoid…