From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Hobbs

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Jul 31, 2014
2014 Ark. 337 (Ark. 2014)

Opinion

No. CV-14-122

07-31-2014

JIMMY SMITH APPELLANT v. RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION APPELLEE


APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL [LINCOLN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. 40CV-13-109] HONORABLE JODI RAINES DENNIS, JUDGE MOTION GRANTED.

PER CURIAM

On February 7, 2014, appellant Jimmy Smith lodged an appeal in this court from a circuit court order that had dismissed his pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus. The appellee State now asks that the appeal be dismissed for appellant's failure to submit a brief.

Appellant was informed that his brief-in-chief was due here no later than March 19, 2014. As of the date of this opinion, he has not tendered a brief or filed a motion to file a belated brief. He has taken no action to pursue the appeal.

Failure of an appellant who is acting pro se to file a brief in an appeal is cause for dismissal of the appeal. Ball v. State, 2014 Ark. 152 (per curiam); Farnsworth v. State, 2013 Ark. 484 (per curiam); Butler v. Hobbs, 2012 Ark. 162 (per curiam); Barker v. Hobbs, 2011 Ark. 420 (per curiam); Ingold v. State, 2009 Ark. 611 (per curiam); Vickers v. State, 2009 Ark. 585 (per curiam); Pineda v. State, 2009 Ark. 554 (per curiam).

Motion granted.


Summaries of

Smith v. Hobbs

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Jul 31, 2014
2014 Ark. 337 (Ark. 2014)
Case details for

Smith v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY SMITH APPELLANT v. RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

Date published: Jul 31, 2014

Citations

2014 Ark. 337 (Ark. 2014)