From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barker v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 6, 2011
2011 Ark. 420 (Ark. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-627

Opinion Delivered October 6, 2011

Appellee's Motion to Dismiss Appeal, [Lincoln County Circuit Court, LCV 2011-11, Hon. Jodi Raines Dennis, Judge], Motion Granted.


On April 13, 2011, an order was entered in the Lincoln County Circuit Court dismissing a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Jimmie Barker. On June 21, 2011, appellant Barker lodged an appeal here from that order. The appellee State now asks that the appeal be dismissed for appellant's failure to submit a brief.

Appellant was informed that his brief-in-chief was due here no later than August 1, 2011. Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time to file the brief, nor has he sought to file a belated brief or taken any other action to pursue the appeal.

The appellee's motion is granted pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-5 (2011). Failure of an appellant who is acting pro se to file a brief in an appeal is cause for dismissal of an appeal. See Ingold v. State, 2009 Ark. 611 (per curiam); see also Vickers v. State, 2009 Ark. 585 (per curiam); Pineda v. State, 2009 Ark. 554 (per curiam).

Motion granted.


Summaries of

Barker v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 6, 2011
2011 Ark. 420 (Ark. 2011)
Case details for

Barker v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:Jimmie BARKER, Appellant v. Ray HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of…

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

2011 Ark. 420 (Ark. 2011)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Hobbs

He has taken no action to pursue the appeal. Failure of an appellant who is acting pro se to file a brief in…

Farnsworth v. State

He has taken no action to pursue the appeal. Failure of an appellant who is acting pro se to file a brief in…