From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ball v. State

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Apr 3, 2014
2014 Ark. 152 (Ark. 2014)

Opinion

No. CR-13-1021

04-03-2014

MICHAEL EVERETT BALL APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

Michael Everett Ball, pro se appellant. Dustin McDaniel, Att'y Gen., by: David R. Raupp, Sr. Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee.


APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS

APPEAL [WASHINGTON COUNTY

CIRCUIT COURT, 72CR-10-1933, 72CR-

11-57]


HONORABLE WILLIAM A. STOREY,

JUDGE


MOTION GRANTED.


PER CURIAM

On November 18, 2013, appellant Michael Everett Ball lodged an appeal in this court from a circuit court order that had denied and dismissed his pro se petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2012). The appellee State now asks that the appeal be dismissed for appellant's failure to submit a brief.

Appellant was informed that his brief-in-chief was due here no later than December 30, 2013. As of the date of this opinion, he has not tendered a brief or filed a motion to file a belated brief. He has taken no action to pursue the appeal.

Failure of an appellant who is acting pro se to file a brief in an appeal is cause for dismissal of the appeal. Farnsworth v. State, 2013 Ark. 484 (per curiam); Butler v. Hobbs, 2012 Ark. 162 (per curiam); Barker v. Hobbs, 2011 Ark. 420 (per curiam); Ingold v. State, 2009 Ark. 611 (per curiam); Vickers v. State, 2009 Ark. 585 (per curiam); Pineda v. State, 2009 Ark. 554 (per curiam).

Motion granted.

Michael Everett Ball, pro se appellant.

Dustin McDaniel, Att'y Gen., by: David R. Raupp, Sr. Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee.


Summaries of

Ball v. State

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Apr 3, 2014
2014 Ark. 152 (Ark. 2014)
Case details for

Ball v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL EVERETT BALL APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

Court:SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

Date published: Apr 3, 2014

Citations

2014 Ark. 152 (Ark. 2014)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Hobbs

He has taken no action to pursue the appeal. Failure of an appellant who is acting pro se to file a brief in…

Mills v. State

As Mills has failed to file a brief in this appeal and has taken no action to pursue the appeal except for…