From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shafer v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 2000
(N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 10, 2000)

Opinion

Argued December 16, 1999

February 10, 2000

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated January 6, 1999, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 306-b and 214 N.Y.CPLR to dismiss the complaint.

Frank V. Merlino (Sweetbaum Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N Y [Marshall D. Sweetbaum] of counsel), for appellant.

Donna R. Newman, New York, N.Y., for respondents.

LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, SONDRA MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the current version ofCPLR 306-b, which became effective on January 1, 1998 (L 1997, ch 476, § 2), may not be applied retroactively (see,Ulster Heights Property v. Assessor of Town of Orangetown, 261 A.D.2d 478 ; Connor v. Deas, 255 A.D.2d 287 ).

BRACKEN, J.P., SANTUCCI, THOMPSON, and S. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shafer v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 2000
(N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 10, 2000)
Case details for

Shafer v. Friedman

Case Details

Full title:ALEKSANDR SHAFER, et al., respondents, v. DAVID M. FRIEDMAN, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 10, 2000

Citations

(N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 10, 2000)