From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter, Ulster H. Prop. v. Asses., Orangetown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 1999
261 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 10, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Palella, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and proceedings to review the assessments for the tax years 1994-1995 and 1995-1996 are dismissed.

With respect to the proceeding to review the real property tax assessments for the 1994-1995 tax year, the record reveals that the petitioner filed an affidavit of service on August 23, 1994, which was more than 15 days after the 30-day Statute of Limitations expired ( see, RPTL 702 Real Prop. Tax[2]). With respect to the proceeding regarding the 1995-1996 tax year, the record reveals that the petitioner never filed an affidavit of service or any other acceptable proof of service within the statutory period. Inasmuch as the petitioner failed to timely file proof of service, the 1994-1995 and 1995-1996 proceedings were automatically deemed dismissed pursuant to CPLR former 306-b N.Y.CPLR (a) ( see, Bochen v. Schieffelin Somerset Co., 242 A.D.2d 314; Mohammed v. Elassal, 226 A.D.2d 509; cf., Matter of Blue Hill Plaza Assocs. v. Assessor[s] of Town of Orangetown, 260 A.D.2d 476; Matter of Goshen Shopping Assocs. v. Assessor[s] of Town of Goshen, 260 A.D.2d 481).

As we have recently held, the current version of CPLR 306-b, which became effective on January 1, 1998 (L 1997, ch 476, § 2), may not be applied retroactively ( see, Connor v. Deas, 255 A.D.2d 287; see also, Floyd v. Salamon Bros., 249 A.D.2d 139). Accordingly, the Supreme Court's conclusion to the contrary was in error.

Mangano, P. J., H. Miller, Feuerstein, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter, Ulster H. Prop. v. Asses., Orangetown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 1999
261 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter, Ulster H. Prop. v. Asses., Orangetown

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ULSTER HEIGHTS PROPERTY, INC., Respondent v. ASSESSOR OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 10, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
690 N.Y.S.2d 121

Citing Cases

Shafer v. Friedman

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the current version ofCPLR 306-b, which became effective on January…

Merideth v. North Shore Univ. Hosp

However, the plaintiffs were unable to serve the appellant and file proof of service within the 120-day…