From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Connor v. Deas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 2, 1998
255 A.D.2d 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 2, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the dismissal of the plaintiff's action for failure to timely file proof of service pursuant to CPLR former 306-b (a) was automatic and self-executing (see, Dolson v. DiPietro, 251 A.D.2d 535; Long v. Quinn, 234 A.D.2d 520; Brackett v. St. Mary's Hosp., 233 A.D.2d 357), and that nunc pro tunc relief was not available (see, Kelly v. Delaney, 248 A.D.2d 360; Long v. Quinn, supra, at 521-522). Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, there is no basis for retroactive application of the new CPLR 306-b (see, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes § 52; Floyd v. Salamon Bros., 249 A.D.2d 139).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Connor v. Deas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 2, 1998
255 A.D.2d 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Connor v. Deas

Case Details

Full title:DARLINA CONNOR, as Executor of JAMES CONNOR, Deceased, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 2, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 321

Citing Cases

Zimmer v. Lake Shore Hospital

The Court of Appeals concluded that the threshold filing defect did not authorize a sua sponte dismissal…

Williamson v. Edwards

Ordered that the appellant is awarded one bill of costs. The plaintiff's complaint, insofar as it is asserted…