Summary
granting plaintiff's motion for exemption from filing fee under USERRA
Summary of this case from Piland v. Duke Drilling Co.Opinion
Case No. 4:09-cv-147.
April 15, 2009
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING FEE
Before the court is the Plaintiff's "Motion for Exemption from Filing Fee" (de # 4). In his Motion, the Plaintiff asks the court to find that he is exempt from paying a filing fee in this civil action. The Plaintiff claims that he was illegally fired based on his service in the United States armed forces in violation of the Uniform Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act ("USERRA"), 38 U.S.C. § 4301, et seq.
Section 4323(h)(1) provides that "[n]o fees or court costs may be charged or taxed against any person claiming rights under this chapter." In the seminal USERRA filing fee case, the Seventh Circuit construed this language to exempt a plaintiff from the necessity of paying a filing fee. Davis v. Advocate Health Ctr. Patient Care Express, 523 F.3d 681, 685 (7th Cir. 2008). The court relied on the plain language of the statute and Congress's intent to minimize the burden on those claiming rights under the statute in finding that the above-quoted language covers the fee normally associated with filing a complaint in federal court. Indeed, it is the unabridged language of the statute that differentiates it between other tax-costing statutes, which typically hinge on which party prevails. See id. at 684; see also, e.g., FED. R. CIV. P. 54(d). Mindful that the Fifth Circuit also construes USERRA liberally, Sykes v. Columbus Greenville Ry., 117 F.3d 287, 294 (5th Cir. 1997) (construing predecessor statute), the court finds that the Plaintiff should be allowed to proceed without paying a filing fee. Accordingly, the court is of the opinion that the Plaintiff's "Motion for Exemption from Filing Fee" (de # 4) should be, and hereby is, GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.