From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chambers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 12, 1999
257 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

January 12, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J.).


We reject defendant's contention that the court was required to impose concurrent sentences for defendant's convictions for vehicular assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.03) and leaving the scene of an incident without reporting (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600 Veh. Traf.). Concurrent sentences must be imposed "for two * * * offenses committed through a single act or omission, or through an act or omission which in itself constituted one of the offenses and also was a material element of the other" (Penal Law § 70.25). The "acts or omissions" committed by defendant under each offense were separate and distinct acts, such that consecutive sentences may be imposed ( see, People v. Laureano, 87 N.Y.2d 640, 644-645; People v. Levy, 157 Misc.2d 941, 946). The "actus reus" of vehicular assault in the second degree, defendant's act of operating a motor vehicle with criminal negligence and with a .10% or greater blood alcohol level, causing serious physical injury to another person, does not constitute a material element of the crime of leaving the scene of an incident without reporting. At best, the two crimes have one element in common, i.e., that the victim suffered serious physical injury.

Defendant's reliance on People v. Catone ( 65 N.Y.2d 1003) is misplaced. Catone held that since causing death to another person due to defendant's culpable conduct was [then] one of the material elements of the felony of leaving the scene of an accident without reporting, while also constituting the crime of manslaughter in the second degree (recklessly causing the death of another person), consecutive sentences for the two crimes were impermissible (65 N.Y.2d, supra, at 1005). However, this ruling was nullified by the Legislature's amendment of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600 Veh. Traf. in 1986, in which it eliminated the culpability requirement of the offense of leaving the scene of an incident.

Accordingly, Penal Law § 70.25 does not preclude consecutive sentences for these two offenses.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Chambers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 12, 1999
257 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Chambers

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NOVIS CHAMBERS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 12, 1999

Citations

257 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
683 N.Y.S.2d 238

Citing Cases

People v. Jordan

"[T]he defendant's challenge to the Supreme Court's refusal to charge criminally negligent homicide as a…

People v. Jordan

"[T]he defendant's challenge to the Supreme Court's refusal to charge criminally negligent homicide as a…