From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palughi v. Dow

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 14, 1995
659 So. 2d 112 (Ala. 1995)

Summary

holding that an order dismissing a complaint without prejudice was not a final judgment that would support an appeal

Summary of this case from Ragland v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Opinion

1940009.

April 14, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Mobile County, No. CV-94-1198, Edward B. McDermott, J.

Peter J. Palughi, Mobile, pro se.

Charles S. Willoughby of Cherry, Givens, Peters, Lockett Diaz, P.C., Mobile, for appellee.


Peter J. Palughi brought a declaratory action against Michael C. Dow, mayor of Mobile, asking the trial court to declare that a conflict of interest existed between Dow's mayoral duties and his activities as the chief executive officer of the Jobs for Alabamians Coalition, a nonprofit organization that encourages the passage of state legislation to authorize casino gambling in Mobile. Dow moved to dismiss the action, arguing that Palughi was merely seeking an advisory opinion, rather than bringing a claim that was justiciable under the Declaratory Judgments Act, Ala. Code 1975, § 6-6-220 et seq. After oral argument, the trial court dismissed the case, without prejudice. Palughi appeals.

This Court has held that the words "without prejudice," when used in an order, "mean that there is no decision of the controversy on its merits, and [that an order containing those words] leaves the whole subject in litigation as much open to another suit as if no suit had ever been brought." Vacalis v. Lowry, 279 Ala. 264, 267, 184 So.2d 345, 347-48 (1966); see, also, Taylor v. Major Finance Co., 289 Ala. 458, 268 So.2d 738 (1972). An appeal will ordinarily lie only from a final judgment; that is, a judgment that conclusively determines the issues before the court and ascertains and declares the rights of the parties. Rule 54(b), A.R.Civ.P. The trial court has not addressed the merits of the issues that Palughi now raises; accordingly, there is no final judgment upon which to base an appeal, and this Court has no jurisdiction over the matter. The appeal is dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, HOUSTON and INGRAM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Palughi v. Dow

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 14, 1995
659 So. 2d 112 (Ala. 1995)

holding that an order dismissing a complaint without prejudice was not a final judgment that would support an appeal

Summary of this case from Ragland v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

describing the circumstances under which an order constitutes a final judgment for purposes of Rule 54(b), Ala. R. Civ. P.

Summary of this case from Rhodes v. Funk

dismissing an appeal taken from an order that dismissed the plaintiff's action without prejudice because the order was not a final judgment that would support an appeal

Summary of this case from Walker Bros. Inv., Inc. v. City of Mobile

stating that, when an action has been dismissed without prejudice, "there is no final judgment upon which to base an appeal"

Summary of this case from McDonald v. Across the Pond, Inc.

In Palughi v. Dow, 659 So.2d 112 (Ala. 1995), the Alabama Supreme Court dismissed an appeal as being from a nonfinal judgment when the trial court had dismissed the case "without prejudice."

Summary of this case from J.J. v. J.B
Case details for

Palughi v. Dow

Case Details

Full title:Peter J. PALUGHI v. Michael C. DOW, as Mayor of the City of Mobile, Alabama

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Apr 14, 1995

Citations

659 So. 2d 112 (Ala. 1995)

Citing Cases

J.J. v. J.B

This court stated: "Because the probate court's judgment expressly stated that the action had been dismissed…

Teague v. Hamm

We note that, generally, a dismissal without prejudice is considered a nonfinal order that cannot support an…