Opinion
2013-UP-469
12-18-2013
Misty S. McDaniel, Respondent, v. Larry A. McDaniel, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2011-191346
Walter Christopher Castro, of Central, for Appellant. Misty S. McDaniel, pro se, of North Myrtle Beach.
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Submitted November 1, 2013
Appeal From Horry County Lisa A. Kinon, Family Court Judge
Walter Christopher Castro, of Central, for Appellant.
Misty S. McDaniel, pro se, of North Myrtle Beach.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Doe v. Doe, 370 S.C. 206, 212, 634 S.E.2d 51, 54 (Ct. App. 2006) ("To preserve an issue for appellate review, the issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court."); Staubes v. City of Folly Beach, 339 S.C. 406, 412, 529 S.E.2d 543, 546 (2000) ("Error preservation requirements are intended to enable the lower court to rule properly after it has considered all relevant facts, law, and arguments." (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Washington v. Washington, 308 S.C. 549, 551, 419 S.E.2d 779, 781 (1992) (holding where an appellant neither raises an issue at trial nor through a Rule 59(e), SCRCP, motion, the issue is not preserved for appellate review).
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.