From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rivera v. Northrup

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 20, 1966
26 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

June 20, 1966

Appeal from the Monroe Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Vecchio, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and application denied. Memorandum: Relief may be granted in the nature of mandamus to compel the performance of ministerial acts by Commissioners of Election pursuant to article 78 of CPLR. Included in such ministerial acts is the clerical determination by the Commissioners as to whether petitions have been signed by a sufficient number of qualified voters. (Cf. Matter of Mansfield v. Epstein, 5 N.Y.2d 70, 73.) In the instant case petitioners seek to invalidate petitions that require the determination of issues of fact such as are ordinarily raised by claims of fraud. (Cf. Matter of Bednarsh v. Cohen, 267 App. Div. 133, 135.) This may only be done in a proceeding under section 330 of the Election Law and the time limit (June 8, 1966) therein stated is controlling. It follows the proceeding was not timely commenced. We do not reach or pass upon the merits of the proceeding.


Summaries of

Matter of Rivera v. Northrup

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 20, 1966
26 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Matter of Rivera v. Northrup

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDWIN S. RIVERA et al., Respondents, v. ROBERT W…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 20, 1966

Citations

26 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

White v. Joyner

Thereafter, courts still permitted an article 78 proceeding in the nature of mandamus. It has been held that…

Stern v. The Putnam Cnty. Bd. of Elections

3. Rivera v Northrup 26 A.D.2d 612 (4th Dept, 1966) This case was somewhat…