From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Fuentes v. D'Apice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 20, 1986
122 A.D.2d 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

August 20, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walsh, J.).


Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, application denied, and the Board of Elections is directed to remove the petitioner's name from the appropriate ballot.

Initially, we hold that the instant validation proceeding was not jurisdictionally defective merely because the order to show cause provided that service upon the objectors be effected by mailing a copy of the order and petition on or before July 24, 1986, the last date upon which said proceeding could be timely commenced (see, Matter of Pell v Coveney, 37 N.Y.2d 494; Warner v Canary, 112 A.D.2d 1073; Matter of Gartner v Salerno, 74 A.D.2d 958, lv denied 49 N.Y.2d 704). We find that under the circumstances, this manner of service gave adequate notice of the proceeding to the objectors and therefore was proper.

However, with respect to the merits of this case, we cannot agree with the Supreme Court, Westchester County, that the challenged signatures on the designating petition were valid, since it is undisputed that the subscribing witnesses' statements attesting thereto omitted or contained incorrect election district designations or unexplained alterations, which defects have repeatedly been held to be fatal (see, Election Law § 6-132; Matter of Jonas v Velez, 65 N.Y.2d 954; Matter of Liss v Sadowski, 59 N.Y.2d 635; Matter of Fiorella v Mahoney, 64 A.D.2d 1008). Since, absent the challenged signatures, the petitioner had fewer than the minimum number of valid signatures required, his name cannot remain on the ballot.

We additionally note that at the time of argument before Supreme Court, Westchester County, counsel waived production of the transcript in the event of an appeal. Therefore, we do not have a record upon which to consider any other factual issues presented to that court which may have affected the validity of the designating petition or the proceedings before the Westchester County Board of Elections. Brown, J.P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Fuentes v. D'Apice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 20, 1986
122 A.D.2d 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Matter of Fuentes v. D'Apice

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FERNANDO FUENTES, Respondent, v. ANTONIA D'APICE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 20, 1986

Citations

122 A.D.2d 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Matter of Valli v. Walker

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Initially, we hold that these…

Matter of Rutherford v. Jones

Here, the insertion of the numbers 38 or 41 was incorrect. An omission or error in the recording of an…