From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warner v. Canary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 22, 1985
112 A.D.2d 1073 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

August 22, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.).


Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Appellant's contention that the validation proceeding was not timely commenced is without merit in light of the fact that the parties concede that personal service was effected on July 25, 1985, the last date upon which said proceeding could be timely brought ( see, Election Law § 16-102). Moreover, service by mail, as provided for in the order to show cause, was satisfactory under the circumstances herein ( see, Matter of Pell v. Coveney, 37 N.Y.2d 494; Matter of Gartner v. Salerno, 74 A.D.2d 958, lv denied 49 N.Y.2d 704). Additionally, we find no merit in appellant's contention that all the signatures on the designated petition should be held invalid. The two pages of the petition witnessed by petitioner Warner alone contain more than enough signatures to support said petition. Therefore, we need not reach appellant's arguments concerning the alleged invalidity of the signatures witnessed by candidate O'Shea subsequent to his signing of the designating petition of another candidate for the same office. Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Thompson, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Warner v. Canary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 22, 1985
112 A.D.2d 1073 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Warner v. Canary

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD J. WARNER, Respondent, v. WILLIAM J. CANARY, JR., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 22, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 1073 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Matter of Fuentes v. D'Apice

Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, application denied, and the Board of Elections…

Matter of Davis v. Piggott

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. At the outset we note that…