September 25, 1998
Because we conclude that respondent has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law ( see, 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]), We deny the application for reinstatement.
Mikoll, J.P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Graffeo, JJ., concur.
Ordered that respondent's application for reinstatement is denied.
Full title:In the Matter of KEVIN A. CONINE, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Sep 25, 1998
Respondent is a Florida attorney who resigned from the bar in that State after disciplinary charges were…
Matter of Schechterman [3d Dept 2000Respondent is a Florida attorney who resigned from the bar in that state after disciplinary charges were…