From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Schechterman [3d Dept 2000

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 3, 2000
(N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 3, 2000)

Opinion

February 3, 2000

Respondent was suspended from practice effective March 15, 1994, and until further order of this court (Matter of Schechterman, 202 A.D.2d 788). He now applies for reinstatement to practice. Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, opposes the application.

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Lawrence Schechterman, Coral Springs, Florida, respondent in person.

Before: MERCURE, J.P., SPAIN, CARPINELLO, GRAFFEO and MUGGLIN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Respondent is a Florida attorney who resigned from the bar in that state after disciplinary charges were brought against him. He has not applied for readmission in Florida.

Because we conclude that respondent has not demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law (see, 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]), we deny the application for reinstatement (see, e.g.,Matter of Conine, 253 A.D.2d 999).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Graffeo and Mugglin, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application for reinstatement is denied.


Summaries of

Matter of Schechterman [3d Dept 2000

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 3, 2000
(N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 3, 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Schechterman [3d Dept 2000

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LAWRENCE SCHECHTERMAN, a Suspended Attorney. COMMITTEE ON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 3, 2000

Citations

(N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 3, 2000)