From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Schechterman, Suspended Attorney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 28, 2000
268 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

January 28, 2000.

Respondent was suspended from practice effective March 15, 1994 and until further order of this Court (Matter of Schechterman, 202 A.D.2d 788). He now applies for reinstatement to practice. Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, opposes the application.

Present Mercure, J. P., Spain, Carpinello, Graffeo and Mugglin, JJ., concur.


Respondent is a Florida attorney who resigned from the bar in that State after disciplinary charges were brought against him. He has not applied for readmission in Florida.

Because we conclude that respondent has not demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law ( see, 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b], we deny the application for reinstatement ( see, e.g., Matter of Conine, 253 A.D.2d 999).

Ordered that respondent's application for reinstatement is denied.


Summaries of

Matter of Schechterman, Suspended Attorney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 28, 2000
268 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Schechterman, Suspended Attorney

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LAWRENCE SCHECHTERMAN, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 28, 2000

Citations

268 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
701 N.Y.S.2d 921