From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lynora A. v. Edwin Gould Servs. for Children & Families (In re Marlyn J'Ace A.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 27, 2012
101 A.D.3d 646 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-12-27

In re MARLYN J'ACE A., A Dependent Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Lynora A., Respondent–Appellant, Edwin Gould Services for Children and Families, Petitioner–Respondent.

Israel P. Inyama, New York, for appellant. John R. Eyerman, New York, for respondent.


Israel P. Inyama, New York, for appellant. John R. Eyerman, New York, for respondent.
Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Selene D'Alessio of counsel), attorney for the child.

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Jeanette Ruiz, J.), entered on or about August 4, 2011, which, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent mother suffers from a mental illness, terminated her parental rights to the subject child and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Clear and convincing evidence supports the determination that respondent, by reason of mental illness, is presently and for the foreseeable future unable to provide proper and adequate care for her child ( see Social Services Law § 384–b[4][c]; [6][a] ). The court-appointed expert testified that respondent suffers from schizophrenia, non-differentiated type with paranoid features, and that this condition, which was manifest during the expert's interview with respondent, prevents her from adequately caring for the child presently and for the foreseeable future. The expert also testified that respondent refuses treatment and is noncompliant with medication ( see Matter of Timothy Reynaldo L.M. [ Frances M.], 89 A.D.3d 542, 933 N.Y.S.2d 12 [1st Dept. 2011],lv. denied18 N.Y.3d 806, 940 N.Y.S.2d 216, 963 N.E.2d 793 [2012] ). Respondent did not present any evidence to rebut the expert's testimony ( see Matter of Isis S.C. [Doreen S.], 98 A.D.3d 905, 906, 950 N.Y.S.2d 902 [1st Dept. 2012] ).

We have considered respondent's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, DeGRASSE, MANZANET–DANIELS, CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lynora A. v. Edwin Gould Servs. for Children & Families (In re Marlyn J'Ace A.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 27, 2012
101 A.D.3d 646 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Lynora A. v. Edwin Gould Servs. for Children & Families (In re Marlyn J'Ace A.)

Case Details

Full title:In re MARLYN J'ACE A., A Dependent Child Under Eighteen Years of Age…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 27, 2012

Citations

101 A.D.3d 646 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 9173
955 N.Y.S.2d 872