From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frances M. v. Children's Aid Soc. (In re Timothy Reynaldo L.M.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 15, 2011
89 A.D.3d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-11-15

In re TIMOTHY REYNALDO L.M., a Dependent Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc.,Frances M., et al., Respondents–Appellants,The Children's Aid Society, Petitioner–Respondent.

Lisa H. Blitman, New York, for Frances M., appellant. John J. Marafino, Mount Vernon, for Reynaldo L., appellant.


Lisa H. Blitman, New York, for Frances M., appellant. John J. Marafino, Mount Vernon, for Reynaldo L., appellant. Rosin Steinhagen Mendal, New York (Douglas H. Reiniger of counsel), for respondent.Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Marcia Egger of counsel), attorney for the child.ANDRIAS, J.P., FRIEDMAN, DeGRASSE, FREEDMAN, MANZANET–DANIELS, JJ.

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Karen I. Lupuloff, J.), entered on or about May 18, 2009, which, upon a finding that respondent mother suffered from mental illness and that respondent father suffered from mental retardation, terminated respondents' parental rights to the subject child and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding that the mother suffered from mental illness was supported by clear and convincing evidence ( see Social Services Law § 384–b [4][c], [6][a] ). The court-appointed psychologist conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the mother and determined that the mother's mental illness, and her reluctance to take medication for her condition, rendered her incapable of caring for the child presently and for the foreseeable future ( see Matter of Roberto A. [Altagracia A.], 73 A.D.3d 501, 899 N.Y.S.2d 839 [2010], lv. denied 15 N.Y.3d 703, 2010 WL 2605873 [2010]; Matter of Victoria Lauren W., 15 A.D.3d 165, 788 N.Y.S.2d 601 [2005] ).

Clear and convincing evidence, including the psychologist's testimony, also demonstrated that the father is unable, at present and for the foreseeable future, to provide proper and adequate care for the subject child by reason of his mental retardation, which originated during his developmental period ( see Social Services Law § 384–b[4][c], [6][b]; Matter of Jasmine Pauline M., 62 A.D.3d 483, 879 N.Y.S.2d 407 [2009] ).

We have considered respondents' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Frances M. v. Children's Aid Soc. (In re Timothy Reynaldo L.M.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 15, 2011
89 A.D.3d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Frances M. v. Children's Aid Soc. (In re Timothy Reynaldo L.M.)

Case Details

Full title:In re TIMOTHY REYNALDO L.M., a Dependent Child Under Eighteen Years of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 15, 2011

Citations

89 A.D.3d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
933 N.Y.S.2d 12
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8214

Citing Cases

SCO Family of Servs. v. Tyrone W. (In re Heaven A. A.)

The Social Services Law expressly incorporates Domestic Relations Law § 111, which provides that the…

Lynora A. v. Edwin Gould Servs. for Children & Families (In re Marlyn J'Ace A.)

The court-appointed expert testified that respondent suffers from schizophrenia, non-differentiated type with…