From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doreen S. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. (In re Isis S.C.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 27, 2012
98 A.D.3d 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-09-27

In re ISIS S.C., A Dependant Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Doreen S., Respondent–Appellant, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.

Steven N. Feinman, White Plains, for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Susan B. Eisner of counsel), for respondent.


Steven N. Feinman, White Plains, for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Susan B. Eisner of counsel), for respondent.
Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Diane Pazar of counsel), attorney for the child.

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda J. Cohen, J.), entered on or about January 5, 2010, which, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent mother suffers from a mental illness, terminated her parental rights to the subject child and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner agency presented clear and convincing evidence that respondent is presently and for the foreseeable future unable to provide proper and adequate care for her child by reason of mental illness ( seeSocial Services Law § 384–b[4][c], [6][a] ). The agency's submissions included unrebutted expert testimony that respondent suffers from a long-standing schizoaffective disorder and major depression that renders her unable to care for the special-needs child, as well as the expert's detailed report, which was prepared *903after lengthy interviews with respondent and review of her mental health records ( see Matter of Michele Amanda N. [Elizabeth N.], 93 A.D.3d 610, 611, 941 N.Y.S.2d 558 [1st Dept. 2012];Matter of Paulidia Antonis R. [Lidia R.], 93 A.D.3d 502, 940 N.Y.S.2d 252 [1st Dept. 2012] ). Although the expert stated that respondent's mental condition was presently “in remission,” he cited respondent's long-standing pattern of intermittent compliance with medication and treatment, which rendered it “highly likely” that her symptoms would return and she would again become delusional.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., ACOSTA, ABDUS–SALAAM, MANZANET–DANIELS, ROMÁN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Doreen S. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. (In re Isis S.C.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 27, 2012
98 A.D.3d 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Doreen S. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. (In re Isis S.C.)

Case Details

Full title:In re ISIS S.C., A Dependant Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 27, 2012

Citations

98 A.D.3d 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6367
950 N.Y.S.2d 902

Citing Cases

Miatta T. v. Catholic Guardian Servs. (In re Priseten T.)

Clear and convincing evidence, including the uncontroverted expert testimony of the court-appointed…

Lynora A. v. Edwin Gould Servs. for Children & Families (In re Marlyn J'Ace A.)

The court-appointed expert testified that respondent suffers from schizophrenia, non-differentiated type with…