From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knapik v. Hanson

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury
May 20, 1992
1992 Ct. Sup. 4617 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992)

Opinion

No. 095518

May 20, 1992


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT #119


Plaintiff sued defendant for injuries suffered when plaintiff was hit by a golf ball allegedly driven by defendant while both were golfing at Whitney Farms Country Club. Defendant then brought a third party complaint against CBL, the alleged owners of the golf course, claiming that he was entitled to contribution from CBL in the event that the jury found defendant liable, because CBL was negligent in its operation and maintenance of the golf course. CBL moves for summary judgment on this third party complaint.

Under General Statutes 52-572h(g) a party is entitled to contribution only after judgment. Rondeau v. Ritenour, 1 CTLR 413 (March 28, 1990, Spear, J.). Thus, third party plaintiff cannot now bring an action for contribution. Id. See also Figuiredo v. Purity Supreme, 5 Conn. L. Rptr. 317 (December 5, 1991, Schaller, J.), Downs v. Torres, 4 Conn. L. Rptr. 635 (August 29, 1991, Hennessey, J.); Fortin v. Bok, 4 Conn. L. Rptr. 223 (May 31, 1991, Ballen, J.); Frederick v. GeneraL Equities, 3 Conn. L. Rptr. 346 (February 13, 1991, Allen, J.); Vahey v. Dodson, 3 Conn. L. Rptr. 91 (January 14, 1991, Nigro, J.). Thus, third party defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and the motion for summary judgment is granted.

The third party plaintiff in this case is actually seeking is the apportionment of liability pursuant to 52-572h. The proper method of having the jury apportion liability to third party defendant, if appropriate, is to have third party plaintiff cite in CBL pursuant to General Statutes 52-102. See Rondeau, supra, Downes, supra, Vahey, supra. See also McKeever v. Papuin, 4 Conn. L. Rptr. 383 (July 19, 1991, Jones, J.); Snipes v. Fisher, 4 Conn. L. Rptr. 416 (July 31, 1991, Wagner, J.); Deveau v. Buccheri, 4 Conn. L. Rptr. 355 (July 3, 1991, Hennessey, J.).

COFIELD, J.


Summaries of

Knapik v. Hanson

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury
May 20, 1992
1992 Ct. Sup. 4617 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992)
Case details for

Knapik v. Hanson

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS J. KNAPIK v. SCOTT HANSON

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury

Date published: May 20, 1992

Citations

1992 Ct. Sup. 4617 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992)

Citing Cases

Doe v. Bay Management Corporation

Id. The court therefore held that the defendants should move for permission to file a third-party complaint…

Aponte v. Johnson

Many courts have held that the above quoted provisions of General Statutes 52-102 is the appropriate basis…