From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Julian B. v. Williams

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 11, 2012
97 A.D.3d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-07-11

In the Matter of JULIAN B. (Anonymous), appellant, v. Nioka WILLIAMS, respondent.

Jeffrey C. Bluth, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant. Anna Stern, New York, N.Y., for respondent.


Jeffrey C. Bluth, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant. Anna Stern, New York, N.Y., for respondent.
Karen Simmons, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Sena Kim–Reuter and Janet Neustaetter of counsel), attorney for the child.

In a custody and visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated June 14, 2011, which denied, without a hearing, his petition to modify a prior order of custody and visitation dated February 14, 2011, so as to award him sole custody of Samia B.

ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated June 14, 2011, is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the subject child, Samia B., is now 18 years of age, she is no longer subject to the order appealed from, and the appeal must be dismissed as academic ( see Matter of Bartley v. Pringle, 90 A.D.3d 653, 933 N.Y.S.2d 889;Matter of Brown v. Jimenez, 88 A.D.3d 875, 876, 931 N.Y.S.2d 522;Matter of Cahill v. Zakian, 71 A.D.3d 765, 895 N.Y.S.2d 738; Matter of Merando v. Vantassel, 66 A.D.3d 783, 886 N.Y.S.2d 356).

DILLON, J.P., DICKERSON, BELEN and SGROI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Julian B. v. Williams

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 11, 2012
97 A.D.3d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Julian B. v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JULIAN B. (Anonymous), appellant, v. Nioka WILLIAMS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 11, 2012

Citations

97 A.D.3d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 5517
947 N.Y.S.2d 898

Citing Cases

Ring v. Ring

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.Since the subject child has…

Ring v. Ring

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. Since the subject child has…