From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merando v. Vantassel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 2009
66 A.D.3d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-05082, Docket Nos. V-5834-07, V-06457-93, G-03719-07.

October 13, 2009.

In related visitation, guardianship, and custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Gilbert, Ct. Atty. Ref.), entered March 12, 2008, which denied her petition for custody of her minor child, granted the paternal grandmother's petition for guardianship of the child, and dismissed, as academic, her petition to modify an existing order allowing visitation between the paternal grandmother and the child.

Neal D. Futerfas, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

Norbert H. Brown, Jr., Poughkeepsie, N.Y., for respondent.

Tracy Cass MacKenzie, Poughkeepsie, N.Y., attorney for the child.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Florio, Eng and Leventhal, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the child is now over 18 years of age, she is no longer subject to the order appealed from ( see Matter of DelVecchio v DelVecchio, 64 AD3d 594; Matter of McGovern v Lynch, 62 AD3d 712; Matter of Luis A.S., 33 AD3d 793, 794). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed as academic ( see Matter of Cruz v Cruz, 48 AD3d 804, 805; Matter of Zaim R., 43 AD3d 824; Matter of Sassower-Berlin v Berlin, 31 AD3d 771). The matter does not qualify as an exception to the mootness doctrine ( see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715; Matter of Ronald N., 14 AD3d 567).


Summaries of

Merando v. Vantassel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 2009
66 A.D.3d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Merando v. Vantassel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CAROL MERANDO, Appellant, v. COLLEEN VANTASSEL, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 13, 2009

Citations

66 A.D.3d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7417
886 N.Y.S.2d 356

Citing Cases

Pecchioni v. Cusma

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. Since the subject child is…

Matter of Brown v. Jimenez

Since the parties' child is now over 18 years of age, he is no longer subject to the second order appealed…