From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bartley v. Pringle

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 6, 2011
90 A.D.3d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-12-6

In the Matter of George BARTLEY, petitioner-respondent, v. Renee PRINGLE, respondent;Jeanette Pringle, respondent-respondent;Karen P. Simmons, nonparty-appellant.


Karen P. Simmons, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Barbara H. Dildine and Janet Neustaetter of counsel), appellant pro se.

In a custody and visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, Karen P. Simmons, the attorney for the child, appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Krauss, J.), dated November 30, 2010, which granted the petitioner father's motion to dismiss the maternal grandmother's cross petition for custody of the subject child and granted the father's petition for custody of the subject child.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the child is now over 18 years of age, she is no longer subject to the order appealed from, and the appeal must be dismissed as academic ( see Matter of Merando v. Vantassel, 66 A.D.3d 783, 886 N.Y.S.2d 356).

MASTRO, A.P.J., ENG, BELEN and HALL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bartley v. Pringle

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 6, 2011
90 A.D.3d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Bartley v. Pringle

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of George BARTLEY, petitioner-respondent, v. Renee PRINGLE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 6, 2011

Citations

90 A.D.3d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8937
933 N.Y.S.2d 889

Citing Cases

Julian B. v. Williams

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements. During the pendency…

Julian B. v. Williams

ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated June 14, 2011, is dismissed as academic, without costs or…