From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hogan v. Annucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 28, 2018
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 4797 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

524677

06-28-2018

In the Matter of John HOGAN, Appellant, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

John Hogan, Collins, appellant pro se. Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.


John Hogan, Collins, appellant pro se.

Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Mulvey, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

(1) Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (O'Connor, J.), entered February 13, 2017 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules, and (2) motion for, among other things, disbursements.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. We note that the loss of good time incurred by petitioner as a result of the disciplinary proceeding should be restored (see Matter of Rucano v. Annucci, 155 A.D.3d 1217, 1218, 63 N.Y.S.3d 273 [2017], lv denied 30 N.Y.3d 913, 2018 WL 943642 [2018] ). Otherwise, petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled and, as such, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Harrison v. Annucci, 159 A.D.3d 1255, 1256, 70 N.Y.S.3d 102 [2018] ).

As a final matter, petitioner, by motion, requests that he be reimbursed $200.64 for disbursements allegedly expended in connection with this proceeding and he submits monthly disbursement statements with those requested expenditures highlighted. A review of the record confirms that petitioner paid a reduced filing fee of $15, as well as $6.16 in disbursements related to the proceeding. Absent verifiable proof that the other alleged expenditures in fact related to this proceeding, we grant petitioner's motion requesting reimbursement in the amount of $21.16.

ORDRED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ORDERED that the motion is granted, without costs, to the extent that petitioner is awarded disbursements in the amount of $21.16.

McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Mulvey, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hogan v. Annucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 28, 2018
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 4797 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Hogan v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN HOGAN, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 28, 2018

Citations

2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 4797 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 4797

Citing Cases

Baxter v. Annucci

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…