From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 22, 2018
159 A.D.3d 1255 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

525307

03-22-2018

In the Matter of Tyrone HARRISON, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Tyrone Harrison, Rome, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Tyrone Harrison, Rome, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Lynch, Clark, Mulvey and Pritzker, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENTProceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to challenge a tier III determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's institutional account. To the extent that petitioner seeks to be restored to the status that he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, he is not entitled to such relief (see

Matter ofSmart v. Annucci, 155 A.D.3d 1289, 1289, 63 N.Y.S.3d 910 [2017] ; Matter of Smith v. Prack, 131 A.D.3d 784, 784, 14 N.Y.S.3d 722 [2015] ). We note, however, that any loss of good time imposed should be restored (see Matter of Guillebeaux v. Annucci, 156 A.D.3d 1001, 1001, 64 N.Y.S.3d 609 [2017] ; Matter ofUlmer v. Annucci, 155 A.D.3d 1171, 1171, 62 N.Y.S.3d 822 [2017] ). Otherwise, inasmuch as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Ulmer v. Annucci, 155 A.D.3d at 1171, 62 N.Y.S.3d 822; Matter of Habeeb v. Annucci, 153 A.D.3d 1497, 1498, 59 N.Y.S.3d 912 [2017] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

McCarthy, J.P., Lynch, Clark, Mulvey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harrison v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 22, 2018
159 A.D.3d 1255 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Harrison v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Tyrone HARRISON, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 22, 2018

Citations

159 A.D.3d 1255 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
70 N.Y.S.3d 102
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 1978

Citing Cases

Muniz v. Dir. of Special Hous., DOCCS

Although petitioner seeks to be restored to the status that he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary…