From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baxter v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 14, 2022
204 A.D.3d 1203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

533410

04-14-2022

In the Matter of Jason BAXTER, Appellant, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Jason Baxter, Collins, appellant pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.


Jason Baxter, Collins, appellant pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Clark, Colangelo, Ceresia and Fisher, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ferreira, J.), entered June 1, 2021 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding raising various procedural challenges to a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Following joinder of issue, Supreme Court dismissed the petition, and this appeal ensued. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge was not deducted from petitioner's institutional account. Given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the appeal must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Hogan v. Annucci, 162 A.D.3d 1418, 1418, 75 N.Y.S.3d 922 [2018], appeal dismissed 32 N.Y.3d 1001, 86 N.Y.S.3d 759, 111 N.E.3d 1115 [2018] ; cf. Matter of Houston v. Annucci, 200 A.D.3d 1387, 1387, 155 N.Y.S.3d 381 [2021] ; Matter of Fraser v. Venettozzi, 197 A.D.3d 1475, 1476, 152 N.Y.S.3d 357 [2021] ). As the record reflects that petitioner paid a reduced filing fee of $15 and he has requested reimbursement thereof, we grant petitioner's request for that amount.

Garry, P.J., Clark, Colangelo, Ceresia and Fisher, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.


Summaries of

Baxter v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 14, 2022
204 A.D.3d 1203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Baxter v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Jason BAXTER, Appellant, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 14, 2022

Citations

204 A.D.3d 1203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
204 A.D.3d 1203

Citing Cases

Nunez v. Venettozzi

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…

Davis v. Annucci

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…