From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houston v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 16, 2021
200 A.D.3d 1387 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

533441

12-16-2021

In the Matter of Cordarise HOUSTON, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Cordarise Houston, Elmira, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.


Cordarise Houston, Elmira, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Aarons and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge was not deducted from petitioner's inmate account. To the extent that petitioner seeks to be restored to the honor block where he was housed prior to the disciplinary determination, "he is not entitled to such relief, as [incarcerated individuals] have no constitutional or statutory right to their prior housing or programming status" ( Matter of Snyder v. Annucci, 188 A.D.3d 1531, 1532, 132 N.Y.S.3d 892 [2020] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). Accordingly, given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Loccenitt v. Annucci, 196 A.D.3d 993, 993, 148 N.Y.S.3d 397 [2021] ; Matter of Blanchard v. Venettozzi, 194 A.D.3d 1295, 1295, 144 N.Y.S.3d 401 [2021] ). As the record reflects that petitioner was ordered to pay a reduced filing fee of $15, and he has requested reimbursement thereof, we grant petitioner's request for that amount (see Matter of Blanchard v. Venettozzi, 194 A.D.3d at 1295, 144 N.Y.S.3d 401 ).

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Aarons and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.


Summaries of

Houston v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 16, 2021
200 A.D.3d 1387 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Houston v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Cordarise HOUSTON, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 16, 2021

Citations

200 A.D.3d 1387 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
155 N.Y.S.3d 381

Citing Cases

In re Becker

We therefore turn to our assessment concerning his character and fitness and the public interest in his…

In re Becker

We therefore turn to our assessment concerning his character and fitness and the public interest in his…