From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nunez v. Venettozzi

Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 3, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 6209 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

No. 534693

11-03-2022

In the Matter of Manuel Nunez, Petitioner, v. Donald Venettozzi, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Manuel Nunez, Woodbourne, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.


Calendar Date October 7, 2022

Manuel Nunez, Woodbourne, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Ceresia and McShan, JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Baxter v Annucci, 204 A.D.3d 1203, 1203 [3d Dept 2022]; Matter of Fraser v Venettozzi, 197 A.D.3d 1475, 1476 [3d Dept 2021]). As the record reflects that petitioner paid a reduced filing fee of $50 and has paid and documented other expenses in connection with this proceeding in the amount of $124.85, and he has requested reimbursement thereof, we grant petitioner's request for that amount (see Matter of Blanchard v Venettozzi, 194 A.D.3d 1295, 1295 [3d Dept 2021]).

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Ceresia and McShan, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $174.85.


Summaries of

Nunez v. Venettozzi

Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 3, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 6209 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Nunez v. Venettozzi

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Manuel Nunez, Petitioner, v. Donald Venettozzi, as Acting…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 3, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 6209 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Citing Cases

Vann v. Keyser

In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all of the entitled relief, the petition must be…

Jude v. Rodriguez

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…