From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hackett v. Paluck

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 21, 2012
100 A.D.3d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-21

In the Matter of Barbara HACKETT, respondent, v. Michael PALUCK, appellant.

The Law Offices of Richard J. DaVolio, P.C., Patchogue, N.Y., for appellant. Anthony M. Bramante, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent.


The Law Offices of Richard J. DaVolio, P.C., Patchogue, N.Y., for appellant. Anthony M. Bramante, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent.

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an amended order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Kent, J.), dated January 24, 2012, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Watson, S.M.), dated September 6, 2011, which, inter alia, after a hearing, and upon the parties' consent, directed the entry of a money judgment in favor of the mother and against him in the principal sum of $29,445.61.

ORDERED that the amended order dated January 24, 2012, is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court properly denied the father's objections to the order dated September 6, 2011, as that order was entered upon the consent of the parties ( see Matter of Cabral v. Cabral, 61 A.D.3d 863, 878 N.Y.S.2d 389;Matter of Bien–Aime–Schneider v. Schneider, 5 A.D.3d 763, 773 N.Y.S.2d 617;Matter of Proulx v. Ardito, 289 A.D.2d 581, 735 N.Y.S.2d 789;Matter of Benerofe v. Wechsler, 281 A.D.2d 476, 477, 721 N.Y.S.2d 783).

MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, CHAMBERS and LOTT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hackett v. Paluck

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 21, 2012
100 A.D.3d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Hackett v. Paluck

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Barbara HACKETT, respondent, v. Michael PALUCK, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 21, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 8008
953 N.Y.S.2d 897

Citing Cases

Herczegh v. Capolino

ORDERED that the order entered October 5, 2015, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.The Family Court…

Herczegh v. Capolino

ORDERED that the order entered October 5, 2015, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Family Court…