From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herczegh v. Capolino

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 15, 2016
140 A.D.3d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

06-15-2016

In the Matter of Eva HERCZEGH, respondent, v. Thomas CAPOLINO, appellant.

Ellen O'Hara Woods, Blauvelt, NY, for appellant.


Ellen O'Hara Woods, Blauvelt, NY, for appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Sherri L. Eisenpress, J.), entered October 5, 2015. The order denied the father's objections to an order of the same court (Rachelle C. Kaufman, S.M.) entered July 17, 2015, which, inter alia, without a hearing and upon the parties' consent, granted the mother's petition for an upward modification of the father's child support obligation. ORDERED that the order entered October 5, 2015, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the father's objections to the order entered July 17, 2015, as that order was entered upon the consent of the parties (see Matter of Hackett v. Paluck, 100 A.D.3d 898, 899, 953 N.Y.S.2d 897 ; Matter of Cabral v. Cabral, 61 A.D.3d 863, 864, 878 N.Y.S.2d 389 ; Mattre of Bien–Aime–Schneider v. Schneider, 5 A.D.3d 763, 773 N.Y.S.2d 617 ; Matter of Proulx v. Ardito, 289 A.D.2d 581, 735 N.Y.S.2d 789 ).

RIVERA, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Herczegh v. Capolino

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 15, 2016
140 A.D.3d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Herczegh v. Capolino

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Eva HERCZEGH, respondent, v. Thomas CAPOLINO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 15, 2016

Citations

140 A.D.3d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4713
32 N.Y.S.3d 512

Citing Cases

Comoletti v. Papapietro

Contrary to the father's contention, under the circumstances of this case, he was not deprived of his right…