From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herczegh v. Capolino

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jun 15, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4713 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

2015-10617

06-15-2016

In the Matter of Eva Herczegh, respondent, v. Thomas Capolino, appellant.

Ellen O'Hara Woods, Blauvelt, NY, for appellant.


JEFFREY A. COHEN JOSEPH J. MALTESE HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ. (Docket No. F-1213-15)

Ellen O'Hara Woods, Blauvelt, NY, for appellant.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Sherri L. Eisenpress, J.), entered October 5, 2015. The order denied the father's objections to an order of the same court (Rachelle C. Kaufman, S.M.) entered July 17, 2015, which, inter alia, without a hearing and upon the parties' consent, granted the mother's petition for an upward modification of the father's child support obligation.

ORDERED that the order entered October 5, 2015, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the father's objections to the order entered July 17, 2015, as that order was entered upon the consent of the parties (see Matter of Hackett v Paluck, 100 AD3d 898, 899; Matter of Cabral v Cabral, 61 AD3d 863, 864; Mattre of Bien-Aime-Schneider v Schneider, 5 AD3d 763; Matter of Proulx v Ardito, 289 AD2d 581).

RIVERA, J.P., COHEN, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur. ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Herczegh v. Capolino

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jun 15, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4713 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Herczegh v. Capolino

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Eva Herczegh, respondent, v. Thomas Capolino, appellant.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jun 15, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4713 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)