From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ducote v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Sep 27, 2007
No. 09-07-020 CV (Tex. App. Sep. 27, 2007)

Opinion

No. 09-07-020 CV

Submitted on September 6, 2007.

Opinion Delivered September 27, 2007.

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court, Jefferson County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 3983 (85161).

Before GAULTNEY, KREGER, and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Ronald Ducote, d/b/a Butch's Bail Bond Service, appealed the final judgment forfeiting a bond after entry of judgment nisi. The appeal was submitted without briefs because the appellant failed to file his brief by June 8, 2007, the due date for filing a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). On August 16, 2007, we notified the parties that the appeal would be advanced without oral argument. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.9. We also notified the parties that the Court would consider whether damages should be imposed. See Tex. R. App. P. 45.

Bond principal Andre Paul Espree did not file notice of appeal.

The appellant has appealed a bond forfeiture on seven other occasions. See Ducote v. State, No. 09-06-138 CV, 2007 WL 117718 (Tex.App. — Beaumont Jan. 18, 2007, no pet.) (mem. op.); Ducote v. State, Nos. 09-06-016 CV 09-06-017 CV, 2006 WL 1682192 (Tex.App.-Beaumont Jun. 15, 2006, no pet.) (mem. op.); Ducote v. State, No. 07-03-440 CV, 2003 WL 22849808 (Tex.App.-Amarillo Dec. 2, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.); Ducote v. State, Nos. 09-03-035 CV, 09-03-042 CV 09-03 056 CV, 2003 WL 21946896 (Tex.App.-Beaumont Aug. 14, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.). Ducote failed to file a brief in any of these appeals. In this case, a substantial delay occurred in processing the notice of appeal. Although Ducote once again failed to file a brief, he did not contribute to the delay in processing the appeal. Although the appellant's pattern of filing notice of appeal but not filing a brief suggests the appeal has not been brought in good faith but was brought for purposes of delay or harassment, in this appeal, because of the delay in processing his notice of appeal, it would not be appropriate to award damages for filing a frivolous appeal.

In the absence of a brief assigning error, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Ducote v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Sep 27, 2007
No. 09-07-020 CV (Tex. App. Sep. 27, 2007)
Case details for

Ducote v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONALD DUCOTE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Sep 27, 2007

Citations

No. 09-07-020 CV (Tex. App. Sep. 27, 2007)