From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ducote v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jun 15, 2006
Nos. 09-06-016 CV, 09-06-017 CV (Tex. App. Jun. 15, 2006)

Opinion

Nos. 09-06-016 CV, 09-06-017 CV

Submitted on June 6, 2006.

Opinion Delivered June 15, 2006.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Jefferson County, Texas, Trial Cause Nos. 100688 and 101020.

Appeals Dismissed.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., KREGER and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Ronald L. Ducote appealed the final judgments forfeiting two bail bonds after entry of judgments nisi. The appeals were submitted without briefs because the appellant failed to file his briefs by the April 14, 2006 due date. See Tex.R.App.P. 38.6(a). The appellant did not request additional time to file the briefs. See Tex.R.App.P. 38.6(d). On May 16, 2006, we notified the parties that the appeals would be advanced without oral argument. See Tex.R.App.P. 39.9. In the absence of a brief or briefs assigning error, we dismiss the appeals for want of prosecution. Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(a)(1).

Thomas Arceneaux and James Anderson, the principals on the two bonds, did not file notice of appeal.


Summaries of

Ducote v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jun 15, 2006
Nos. 09-06-016 CV, 09-06-017 CV (Tex. App. Jun. 15, 2006)
Case details for

Ducote v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONALD L. DUCOTE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Jun 15, 2006

Citations

Nos. 09-06-016 CV, 09-06-017 CV (Tex. App. Jun. 15, 2006)

Citing Cases

Ducote v. State

The appellant has appealed a bond forfeiture on seven other occasions. See Ducote v. State, No. 09-06-138 CV,…