From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dodson v. Cockrell

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division
Nov 5, 2002
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:02-CV-560-Y (N.D. Tex. Nov. 5, 2002)

Summary

finding no exhaustion in the context of a denial of release to mandatory supervision

Summary of this case from Strickland v. Dretke

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:02-CV-560-Y

November 5, 2002


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS (With Special Instructions to the Clerk of Court)


Before the Court is the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 of petitioner Theodis Dodson Jr., along with the October 9, 2002, findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge gave the parties until October 30 to file written objections to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation. As of the date of this order, no written objections have been filed.

The Court has reviewed the pleadings and the record in this case, and has reviewed for clear error the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on October 9, 2002. The Court concludes that the petition for writ of habeas corpus should be denied, for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions.

It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the magistrate judge should be, and are hereby, ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be, and is hereby, DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that the clerk of the Court shall transmit a copy of this order to all parties by certified mail, return receipt requested.


Summaries of

Dodson v. Cockrell

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division
Nov 5, 2002
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:02-CV-560-Y (N.D. Tex. Nov. 5, 2002)

finding no exhaustion in the context of a denial of release to mandatory supervision

Summary of this case from Strickland v. Dretke

finding no exhaustion in the context of a denial of release to mandatory supervision

Summary of this case from Perez v. Dretke
Case details for

Dodson v. Cockrell

Case Details

Full title:THEODIS DODSON, JR., PETITIONER v. JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, T.D.C.J.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division

Date published: Nov 5, 2002

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:02-CV-560-Y (N.D. Tex. Nov. 5, 2002)

Citing Cases

Strickland v. Dretke

The exhaustion requirement applies to prisoners challenging a denial of release to mandatory supervision. See…

Perez v. Dretke

The exhaustion requirement applies to prisoners challenging a denial of release to mandatory supervision. See…