From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Charles E. Lakin Found., Inc. v. Pribil (In re Estate)

Supreme Court of Nebraska.
Nov 19, 2021
310 Neb. 389 (Neb. 2021)

Opinion

Nos. S-20-093 S-20-094.

11-19-2021

IN RE ESTATE OF Charles E. LAKIN, deceased. Charles E. Lakin Foundation, Inc., appellant, v. Thomas Pribil and William Kilzer, Copersonal Representatives of the Estate of Charles E. Lakin, appellees. In re Trust of Charles E. Lakin, deceased. Charles E. Lakin Foundation, Inc., appellant, v. Thomas Pribil and William Kilzer, Cotrustees of the Charles E. Lakin Revocable Trust, et al., appellees.

Zachary W. Lutz-Priefert, Frederick D. Stehlik, William J. Lindsay, Jr., and John A. Svoboda, of Gross & Welch, P.C., L.L.O., Omaha, for appellant. Edward D. Hotz, Omaha, Amanda M. Forker, and Benjamin C. Deaver, of Pansing, Hogan, Ernst & Bachman, L.L.P., for defendants-appellees Thomas L. Pribil and William A. Kilzer. Trenten P. Bausch and Megan S. Wright, of Cline, Williams, Wright, Johnson & Oldfather, L.L.P., Omaha, for appellee Thomas L. Pribil in his individual capacity. Cathy S. Trent-Vilim and Brian J. Brislen, of Lamson, Dugan & Murray, L.L.P., Omaha, for appellee William A. Kilzer, an individual.


Zachary W. Lutz-Priefert, Frederick D. Stehlik, William J. Lindsay, Jr., and John A. Svoboda, of Gross & Welch, P.C., L.L.O., Omaha, for appellant.

Edward D. Hotz, Omaha, Amanda M. Forker, and Benjamin C. Deaver, of Pansing, Hogan, Ernst & Bachman, L.L.P., for defendants-appellees Thomas L. Pribil and William A. Kilzer.

Trenten P. Bausch and Megan S. Wright, of Cline, Williams, Wright, Johnson & Oldfather, L.L.P., Omaha, for appellee Thomas L. Pribil in his individual capacity.

Cathy S. Trent-Vilim and Brian J. Brislen, of Lamson, Dugan & Murray, L.L.P., Omaha, for appellee William A. Kilzer, an individual.

Heavican, C.J., Cassel, Stacy, Funke, and Freudenberg, JJ.

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

Per Curiam. This case is before us on three motions for rehearing filed by the appellees, Thomas Pribil and William Kilzer—in their individual capacities and their capacities as copersonal representatives and cotrustees—concerning our opinion in In re Estate of Lakin . While there is no substantive merit to the motions, Pribil and Kilzer point out that this court incorrectly found that the check used to pay Pribil was not in our record. The check appears in exhibit 59.

In re Estate of Lakin , 310 Neb. 271, 965 N.W.2d 365 (2021).

We overrule the motions, but modify the original opinion to substitute language as follows. In the paragraph under the subheading "7. § 6-1437," we withdraw the third and fourth sentences and substitute: "Our record is not clear on the source of the payment and the capacity of the person making the payment."

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

FORMER OPINION MODIFIED .

MOTIONS FOR REHEARING OVERRULED .

Miller-Lerman and Papik, JJ., not participating.


Summaries of

Charles E. Lakin Found., Inc. v. Pribil (In re Estate)

Supreme Court of Nebraska.
Nov 19, 2021
310 Neb. 389 (Neb. 2021)
Case details for

Charles E. Lakin Found., Inc. v. Pribil (In re Estate)

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ESTATE OF Charles E. LAKIN, deceased. Charles E. Lakin Foundation…

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska.

Date published: Nov 19, 2021

Citations

310 Neb. 389 (Neb. 2021)
966 N.W.2d 268

Citing Cases

White v. White

§ 30-2485(b)(2). See, e.g., In re Estate of Lakin, 310 Neb. 271, 965 N.W.2d 365 (2021), modified on denial…

Timothy L. Ashford, PC LLO v. Roses

In reviewing a summary judgment, an appellate court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the…