From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barham v. Hawk

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 3, 2006
360 N.C. 358 (N.C. 2006)

Opinion

No. 461PA04.

Filed March 3, 2006.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 165 N.C. App. 708, 600 S.E.2d 1 (2004), vacating a judgment entered on 21 March 2002 by Judge Marlene Hyatt in Superior Court, Polk County, and remanding for a new trial. Heard in the Supreme Court 18 October 2005.

Blanchard, Jenkins, Miller, Lewis Styers, P.A., by Robert O. Jenkins and E. Hardy Lewis, for plaintiff-appellee. Shumaker, Loop Kendrick, LLP, by S. Frederick Winiker, III and John D. Kocher, for defendant-appellants.


Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Barham v. Hawk

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 3, 2006
360 N.C. 358 (N.C. 2006)
Case details for

Barham v. Hawk

Case Details

Full title:GLORIA BARHAM, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF BILLY MELVIN BARHAM…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 3, 2006

Citations

360 N.C. 358 (N.C. 2006)

Citing Cases

Ying Y. Zhang v. Rubin

when that physician is familiar with the experience and training of the defendant and either (1) the…

Williams v. Kane

The refiling of the case within the one-year time limit of the rule begins the case anew for all purposes."…