From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Byrd

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 2002
572 S.E.2d 781 (N.C. 2002)

Opinion

No. 511A01

Filed 20 December 2002

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from an unpublished decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 145 N.C. App. 503, 550 S.E.2d 281 (2001), reversing and remanding orders entered 1 March 2000 and 7 April 2000 by DeVine, J., in District Court, Orange County. On 31 January 2002, the Supreme Court granted discretionary review of additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 May 2002.

J. Randolph Ward for Plaintiff-Appellant. Martin and Martin, P.A., by J. Matthew Martin and Harry C. Martin; and Fisher Law Firm, P.A., by C. Douglas Fisher, for Defendant-Appellee.


Justice BUTTERFIELD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court were equally divided, with three members voting to affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals and three members voting to reverse. Therefore, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Reese v. Barbee, 350 N.C. 60, 510 S.E.2d 374 (1999); Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Byrd

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 2002
572 S.E.2d 781 (N.C. 2002)
Case details for

Robinson v. Byrd

Case Details

Full title:DIANE ROBINSON v. MAYNARD BYRD

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 2002

Citations

572 S.E.2d 781 (N.C. 2002)
572 S.E.2d 781

Citing Cases

State v. Renfro

The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members…

State v. Holden

The members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to…