From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 28, 2018
330 Conn. 950 (Conn. 2018)

Opinion

11-28-2018

Mark BANKS v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Laurie N. Feldman, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition. Pamela S. Nagy, assistant public defender, in opposition.


The respondent's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 184 Conn.App. 101, 194 A.3d 780 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. When a habeas petitioner claims that the criminal trial court erred by, omitting jury instructions on the intent element of kidnapping pursuant to State v. Salamon, 287 Conn. 509, 949 A.2d 1092 (2008), is harm measured in accordance with Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 113 S.Ct. 1710, 123 L.Ed. 2d 353 (1993), or Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 119 S.Ct. 1827, 144 L.Ed. 2d 35 (1999)?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the absence of a Salamon instruction at the petitioner's criminal trial was not harmless error?"

McDONALD and MULLINS, Js., would deny the petition.


Summaries of

Banks v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 28, 2018
330 Conn. 950 (Conn. 2018)
Case details for

Banks v. Comm'r of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Mark BANKS v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Nov 28, 2018

Citations

330 Conn. 950 (Conn. 2018)
197 A.3d 391

Citing Cases

Banks v. Comm'r of Corr.

And (2) "[d]id the Appellate Court [correctly] conclude that the absence of a Salamon instruction at the…

Coltherst v. Comm'r of Corr.

Id., at 131, 194 A.3d 780. Following our decision, our Supreme Court granted the petition for certification…