From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ZOT v. WATSON

Civil Court of the City of New York. Kings County
Jul 2, 2008
20 Misc. 3d 1113 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2008)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Watson the court relied on the Second Department case of Friedlander v Ramos (3 Misc 3d 33), in which the Appellate Term allowed for the filing of proof of service nunc pro tunc to meet the provisions of RPAPL 735 (2).

Summary of this case from Djokic v. Perez
See 1 Summary

Opinion

July 2, 2008.

Kraus, J.

Process — Service of Process — Late Filing of Affidavit of Service. Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law — § 735 (2) (Summary proceeding to recover possession of real property; manner of service; filing; when service complete).

Summaries of

ZOT v. WATSON

Civil Court of the City of New York. Kings County
Jul 2, 2008
20 Misc. 3d 1113 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2008)

In Watson the court relied on the Second Department case of Friedlander v Ramos (3 Misc 3d 33), in which the Appellate Term allowed for the filing of proof of service nunc pro tunc to meet the provisions of RPAPL 735 (2).

Summary of this case from Djokic v. Perez
Case details for

ZOT v. WATSON

Case Details

Full title:Zot, Inc. v. Watson

Court:Civil Court of the City of New York. Kings County

Date published: Jul 2, 2008

Citations

20 Misc. 3d 1113 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 51341

Citing Cases

Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y v. Iandoli

The Appellate Division noted "a summary proceeding is a special proceeding 'governed entirely by statute and…

Mangano v. Ikinko

This statute is equally applicable to proof of service of the notice of petition and petition and…

7 Citing Cases