Summary
In Watson the court relied on the Second Department case of Friedlander v Ramos (3 Misc 3d 33), in which the Appellate Term allowed for the filing of proof of service nunc pro tunc to meet the provisions of RPAPL 735 (2).
Summary of this case from Djokic v. PerezOpinion
July 2, 2008.
Process — Service of Process — Late Filing of Affidavit of Service. Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law — § 735 (2) (Summary proceeding to recover possession of real property; manner of service; filing; when service complete).