Summary
recommending denial of motion to suppress where defendant did not identify the statements to be suppressed or provide other information about them such as their contents and when and where they were made
Summary of this case from United States v. GarciaOpinion
2:18-cr-155-LSC-WC
08-27-2018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DEMETRUS DONYELL PORTER, Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
The defendant has filed a motion to suppress. (Doc. 33.) The magistrate judge held an evidentiary hearing on the motion and subsequently filed a report and recommendation, recommending that the motion be denied in part and granted in part. (Doc. 44.) The United States objected with respect to the in-part grant. (Doc. 50.)
Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the motion to suppress (doc. 33) is hereby DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART.
DONE AND ORDERED ON AUGUST 27, 2018.
/s/_________
L. SCOTT COOGLER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
160704