From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turvey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 27, 2013
Case No. 12-12388 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 27, 2013)

Summary

affirming RFC assessment where "Plaintiff d[id] not specify any additional work-related functional limitations the ALJ should have, but did not, include in the RFC assessment"

Summary of this case from Ferland v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

Case No. 12-12388

06-27-2013

Sean T. Turvey, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [16]

This matter has come before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [16]. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record and the pleadings, including the Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the Court hereby ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is further ordered that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [9] is DENIED, Defendant's motion for summary judgment [15] is GRANTED, the finding and conclusions of the Commissioner are AFFIRMED, and the case is hereby DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

_______________

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on June 27, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Johnetta M. Curry-Williams

Case Manager

Acting in the Absence of Carol Hemeyer


Summaries of

Turvey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 27, 2013
Case No. 12-12388 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 27, 2013)

affirming RFC assessment where "Plaintiff d[id] not specify any additional work-related functional limitations the ALJ should have, but did not, include in the RFC assessment"

Summary of this case from Ferland v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

rejecting the plaintiff's RFC challenge where he did not specify any such additional work-related functional limitations

Summary of this case from Huizar v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

rejecting the plaintiff's challenge to the RFC assessment where he did not "specify any additional work-related functional limitations the ALJ should have, but did not, include in the RFC assessment resulting from his pain or mental limitations."

Summary of this case from Patton v. Saul

rejecting the plaintiff's challenge to the RFC assessment where he did not "specify any additional work- related functional limitations the ALJ should have, but did not, include in the RFC assessment resulting from his pain or mental impairments"

Summary of this case from Collins v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

rejecting the plaintiff's challenge to the RFC assessment where he did not "specify any additional work- related functional limitations the ALJ should have, but did not, include in the RFC assessment resulting from his pain or mental impairments"

Summary of this case from Pugh v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Turvey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Sean T. Turvey, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 27, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-12388 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 27, 2013)

Citing Cases

Tools v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

What more limitations the ALJ should have included-the Court could not possibly know, and Plaintiff does not…

Tarver v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

She does not explain what limitations should have been included in the RFC. See Turvey v. Comm'r of …