From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Bauman

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Oct 9, 2009
CIV-09-926-R (W.D. Okla. Oct. 9, 2009)

Opinion

CIV-09-926-R.

October 9, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking redress for the alleged violation of his constitutional rights. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Valerie K. Couch for preliminary review. On September 30, 2009, Judge Couch issued a Report and Recommendation, wherein she recommended that the case be dismissed for failure to state a claim. In response to the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff filed a response recognizing that he named the wrong persons in his original complaint. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is adopted, and the original complaint in this action is hereby dismissed. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within thirty days of entry of this order. The Clerk shall provide Plaintiff with a the packet of information directed to persons wishing to file complaints pro se. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within thirty days, this case will be closed without further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Bauman

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Oct 9, 2009
CIV-09-926-R (W.D. Okla. Oct. 9, 2009)
Case details for

Smith v. Bauman

Case Details

Full title:ALRIC OLAF SMITH, Plaintiff, v. JIM BAUMAN, BILL WARNER and LOGAN COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 9, 2009

Citations

CIV-09-926-R (W.D. Okla. Oct. 9, 2009)

Citing Cases

Coburn v. Miller

Further, this Court has cited the state-law claim of conversion as an adequate postdeprivation remedy…

Bennett v. Clark

” Coburn, 2019 WL 1087148, at *5 (collecting cases); see Hudson, 468 U.S. at 534-35; Rivera v. Garfield Cnty.…